Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts

Monday, March 1, 2010

Communication

It's important to not just have a good strategy, but to be able to communicate it as well. NAB seems to have doubters on both fronts: The Australian

Key graf:
The question now is whether the NAB narrative is understood.
Mr Clyne believes it is, but admits investors are tough critics who are keen for answers.
"We outlined our strategic view and what's critical to us is that we consistently deliver against that," Mr Clyne said.


Remember too that NAB has better resources than most to try and explain its strategy.

Monday, July 13, 2009

QAN financial and non-financial news

Another article showing the importance of knowing what you need to look for. Qantas' recent earnings announcement - Michael Pascoe goes behind the Income Statement.

Here's the start:
The passenger figures Qantas released to the stock exchange yesterday weren't flash - but the unannounced financial reality was much, much worse.
While Qantas told the ASX its May Qantas International and Jetstar International revenue seat factors were up 4 and 4.8 percentage points respectively, it didn't say that its yield on the combined international business had collapsed by 25 per cent.

Understanding how QAN makes its money is the starting point.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Warren Buffett


Here's the latest Chairman's Letter from Berkshire Hathaway: pdf link. Have a read.

And a key section (from page 6):

Businesses – The Great, the Good and the Gruesome
Let’s take a look at what kind of businesses turn us on. And while we’re at it, let’s also discuss what we wish to avoid.

Charlie and I look for companies that have a) a business we understand; b) favorable long-term economics; c) able and trustworthy management; and d) a sensible price tag. We like to buy the whole business or, if management is our partner, at least 80%. When control-type purchases of quality aren’t available, though, we are also happy to simply buy small portions of great businesses by way of stockmarket purchases. It’s better to have a part interest in the Hope Diamond than to own all of a rhinestone.

A truly great business must have an enduring “moat” that protects excellent returns on invested capital. The dynamics of capitalism guarantee that competitors will repeatedly assault any business
“castle” that is earning high returns. Therefore a formidable barrier such as a company’s being the lowcost producer (GEICO, Costco) or possessing a powerful world-wide brand (Coca-Cola, Gillette, American Express) is essential for sustained success. Business history is filled with “Roman Candles,” companies
whose moats proved illusory and were soon crossed.


* Photo taken from JasonSmith's public flickr stream. Original photo found here.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Strategy, financial analysis, credit crunch, and TPI

TPI's recent strategy has been driven by acquisitions. At the end of this year TPI have to refinance about $2.7bn of debt. Given recent events in the credit market, this could prove interesting. More from Adele Ferguson here. Key quote that backs up what we keep discussing in class:
The ride has been exciting, with the share price going on a roller-coaster ride, and profits going through the roof. But analysing a company that makes a lot of acquisitions is tough, particularly one that has reclassified some of its businesses into different divisions and created new divisions.

Monday, August 6, 2007

Financial information in Australia

I mentioned in class how annoying and inconvenient I find the Australian Financial Review's online strategy - the AFR.com.au site is slow to load, and when it does load, it's full of subscriber only material (which means I by and large won't link to it on this site). The AFR has also removed its material from Factiva, which is one of the UNSW library databases that I regularly use (in my capacity as a researcher) for media searches. In effect, I've argued that the strategy seems to be "let's make The Australian the business newspaper of record)". [Similar to the New York Times "experiment" with TimesSelect].

Looks like Dow Jones agrees. They see a role for a free Australian equivalent of MarketWatch. I think that would be a great development.

Wesfarmers, Coles, strategy & takeovers

Nice little article from Matthew Stevens in the Weekend Australian (Aug 4-5; annoyingly I can't find an online reference) that links business strategy analysis with mergers & acquisitions. He's talking about the (currently) proposed takeover of Coles by Wesfarmers, and focuses on what happens if the bid doesn't go ahead. An interesting time forecast for Coles CEO John Fletcher and Chairman Rick Allert.

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

More dumb strategy decisions


Looks like the new owners of the airport rail line want it to go broke again. In the SMH, we get the following lede:
FOUR months after the Airport Rail Link was bought out of receivership by Westpac, fares on the already costly service will rise by as much as $2.

Despite speculation fares would fall after the buyout to entice more passengers, ticket prices will climb next Monday by between 20 cents and $1.30 for tickets from the city to Mascot and Green Square, and by up to $2 to the airport.

As best I can tell, that's a really really dumb strategy. [Mind you, the airport link should have incorporated the SCG, Fox Studios, UNSW, then down to the airport. Or at least have dedicated trains starting at the airport, so that passengers with their luggage can actually get on the train, and put their bags in a dedicated bag 'area'. Sheesh]


Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Qantas strategy update

Speculation that Qantas will announce a significant change of corporate strategy at their upcoming annual general meeting. I'm sure this will be followed by claims that they are simply responding to the strategy that was proposed by the private equity team that was bidding for Qantas. Note the competing interests of the capital and the product markets here. The capital market wants to know as much as possible about QAN's future plans and strategies, so that it can best guess at how QAN will perform going forward (i.e., so that they can price the equity and debt of QAN). On the other hand, QAN's competitors also get to see what the major player (in the domestic industry in any case) is planning. Competitors may need to adjust their own strategy in response. This is an example of the "proprietary" costs of disclosure - you are giving away (potentially) valuable information to your competitors.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Google, IBM and business strategy

Even (especially?) for the high-tech companies, having a decent corporate strategy, and being able to communicate it clearly to investors is an important part of running the business. Stephen Ellis writes about the difference between Google (GOOG) and IBM (IBM), both of which having just reported for the latest quarter.

Monday, July 23, 2007

(Obligatory) Harry Potter post

The company that publishes the Harry Potter books doesn't appear to have taken advantage of their opportunities to grow their business. [The Australian] That's not smart.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

TPI, mergers and the ACCC

TPI's corporate strategy has been growth-focused. John Durie in The Australian suggests that the ACCC would like to know about some of TPI's proposed takeovers before they are announced. As Durie suggests, though, investors "like nothing better than a company that controls its market."

Wesfarmers and value creation

How will Wesfarmers make money out of buying Coles? Only by selling off part of the business, according to Paul Kerin in The Australian. A good article to read about trying to realise synergies in corporate acquisitions.