Monday, September 24, 2007
Strategy, financial analysis, credit crunch, and TPI
The ride has been exciting, with the share price going on a roller-coaster ride, and profits going through the roof. But analysing a company that makes a lot of acquisitions is tough, particularly one that has reclassified some of its businesses into different divisions and created new divisions.
Friday, September 21, 2007
More on Coles' profit
Key quote:
And it is fair to say that this week's results support their views to the extent of the rot within the all important supermarkets business is greater than even the harsher critics had expected.
The variance in the analysts' views on the underlying profit also suggests that there is a lack of transparency in the earnings numbers and a lack of trust in how they were presented.
They all came to the conclusion that they were poor but were at odds about degree.
It seems that creating confusion, rather than clarity, appears to be one motivation for using pro forma numbers. Not always, mind you.
Always check the audit report...
Thursday, September 20, 2007
AIFRS - all OK so far. Mostly
Earnings quality - Coles
But here come the adjustments. Take off $34.5 million for accounting changes, adjust $55.9 million for ownership review costs, add another $23.9 million in advisory costs and $51.5 million in redundancy costs, then take out $53.5 million in property gains, then tax-effect it and, bingo, the end result is a profit 1 per cent down on last year. And this is not too far off the amount the company has indicated.
A more cynical analysis could come up with a result that was 16 per cent below last year, even after the adjustments.
Yep. That can happen. From the perspective of the Wesfarmers board, it's probably best for Coles to get as much 'bad news' out in the accounts now, so that WES can document improved performance going forward. Assuming that WES can find good managers, improving performance of the Coles stores shouldn't be beyond them!
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Profitability analysis - Ipod
Monday, September 17, 2007
ASX - regulator and profit-maker
A sub-prime primer
UNSW email down
Friday, September 14, 2007
Not fair or reasonable, but the only one you'll get...
More on the Wesfarmers takeover of Coles; the "independent expert report" (see prior discussion here) is in; the offer is apparently not fair, nor reasonable. However, with no realistic prospect of a better offer, the recommendation is for Coles shareholders to accept. Grant Samuel says that the Coles Group is worth $16.21-$18.23 a share (at time of posting this, CGJ is trading at $14.57 (up 6c for the day)). As Matthew Stevens says:
Let's be blunt here: the $930 million gap between the price Wesfarmers will pay and the Grant Samuel valuation is effectively the price Coles shareholders have to surrender to replace the company's crippled management.We'll have a look at how they arrived at that valuation when the document proper is released to the market - hopefully in time for class 11 this semester (when we're discussing takeovers).The fact is, the board has been forced to accept an offer that undervalues Coles by at least $930 million because it has absolutely no other alternative.
UNSW rail link
Key UNSW station quote:
I still say that the Airport rail link should have gone via Taylor Sq, the SCG/SFS, Randwick Racecourse, UNSW, Maroubra, Mascot, Airport. But oddly enough, I wasn't consulted on it. [$14 to go one way from the airport to Town Hall station? You cannot be serious.Mr Staples's plan advocates an east-west underground metro-style line using single-deck carriages and running between Malabar and West Ryde, under Anzac Parade and Victoria Road.
It would ease congestion along Victoria Road, with stations at the University of NSW, Moore Park, Drummoyne, Gladesville and Ryde, all expected to attract large numbers of commuters.
/John McEnroe.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
The value in Qantas...
Accounting for sub-prime losses
The banks (especially in the U.S.) will be preparing their quarterly accounts at the end of September. One of the big issues they will be facing is how to treat their exposure to the sub-prime mortgages. Their assets should be 'marked to market', i.e., banks should determine the 'fair value' of the mortgages (and securitised tranches of mortgages etc). While there are rules as to what to do (i.e. fair value accounting), there is less guidance as to how to do it (i.e. value the mortgages). One of the issues with fair value accounting is the appropriate treatment when there is no active and liquid market (from an Oz article found here:
The banks are also facing losses on their holdings of complex securities where there is often no clear market price because of low trading volumes.This highlights one of the key issues facing accountants in the future; are they going to take up the role of valuation experts, or will they subcontract out of that role and focus more on the straight 'bookkeeping'. With the move towards fair value accounting standards globally, there will be a dramatic increase in work for valuation experts.
Thursday, September 6, 2007
Plagiarism
Takeovers... Wesfarmers/Coles
Something novel in the 'price protected shares'. I'd be hoping that WES shares are about $45 in 4 years...
How well will Coles have to perform to cover it's cost of capital: from John Durie (linked above):
The deal is one thing, the hard part is getting a $20billion deal to earn its keep over the next four years - and that's no easy task. On some estimates, Coles will earn $1 billion this financial year.
Wesfarmers' cost of capital with Coles will be around 10 per cent - which means Goyder will have to double earnings to make his cost of capital.
This won't be a walk in the park - but just for starters, there are some $400 million in costs that can be readily taken out of the business.
WES has a reputation for getting good managers into a business, and then letting them manage. If the Coles board accepts this revised bid, WES will be able to get on with the business of doing that.