Audit fees and earnings quality

This is a bit of a twist on the usual story. The 'concern' about audit and advisory fees is usually expressed like this: higher fees (either absolute or at a relative level) can be thought of as akin to a 'bribe' to the auditors, who will then sign off on financial statements that present a company in a better light than they perhaps should. That's how the regulators seem to view the problem. It's been harder for researchers to 'prove' that this is the case: think about the difficulties in measuring both "earnings quality" and also the level of the 'economic bond' between auditor and client.

In this example (Diverseport Fixed Income), it looks like the auditors and advisors were going for the $ just before a collapse.

St George Westpac takeover

Seems not all St George shareholders are happy with Westpac's proposed takeover. Here's one of the major shareholders, Orion Asset Management's Dushko Bajic, reported in The Oz.

St George had not indicated its opinion of its value. "I find it frightening that the board has not identified its own valuation of St George as a stand-alone entity. How can you be sure of the value of Westpac's scrip and, even more outlandishly, the value of a merged St George/Westpac scrip, when you haven't established your own valuation of your own stock?

"And by the way, it's not good enough to draft in an independent expert after the event -- you've already set the goalposts," he said.

Seems a fair complaint. Note though that simply providing an independent expert's report will not solve everything. See prior posts here.

NAB's pro forma earnings

Adele Ferguson takes apart National Australia Bank's "cash earnings" figure. Once again, the issue with firms reporting non-GAAP, or pro forma earnings, is that of comparability. Comparing NAB's results with those of competitors for this reporting season, and comparing NAB's results over time.

Blame ASIC?

ASIC's chairman argues that ASIC should not be blamed for recent upheavals in the market (oh, other than the short selling stuff). It's an interesting one, though. To what extent should we, and can we, regulate against bad business decision, and bad investment decisions? However, even acknowledging that we can't protect all against all of their bad decisions doesn't mean that companies should be able to go around breaching disclosure rules and the like, seemingly without any meaningful penalty.

Nyles lowers earnings forecast

As reported in The Oz, Nylex lowers its earnings forecast. Note the focus on EBIT and EBITDA numbers, and in particular the 'normalised EBITDA' nubmers. It's not until the end of the article that net income (or net loss) gets a mention!